City Council has paid almost £300,000 in legal fees so far in long-running row over back pay

loxley,house,nottingham,city,council
Loxley House, home to Nottingham City Council
By Kit Sandeman, Local Democracy Reporter

Nottingham City Council has paid more than £290,000 in legal fees alone in their long-running row over back pay with the final bill likely to be much higher.

The dispute began in 2011 when a group of around 600 council workers took the council to court over a decision to freeze incremental pay rises for staff.

A Freedom of Information request found the council has so far spent £290,331.67 on the case, but should be seen ‘in the context of the £28 million the increment freeze has saved’ say the council.

However the council will face further fees as it is set to escalate the row to the Supreme Court, the highest in the land.

The FOI request also asked what the estimated costs were for escalating the cost to the Supreme Court.

The council said the ‘costs for appealing to the Supreme Court against the Court of Appeals decision are not known’.

The council is yet to pay the legal fees of the 600 workers who brought the case forward which it must pay because it lost the most-recent verdict.

When asked about the legal fees, a city council spokesman said: “The decision to freeze incremental pay rises was made as part of the £232 million of savings the council has had to make as a result of its main Government grant being cut by two-thirds since 2011.

“The decision was taken to avoid cuts to jobs and services wherever possible and has saved more than £28 million since 2011, the equivalent of around 1,000 full time jobs.

“Had it not been introduced, further significant cuts to services and job losses would have been unavoidable.

“It was necessary to employ external legal advisors to defend a claim brought against the council.

“The outcome of the initial hearing was in the council’s favour; a further appeal outcome was partially in the council’s favour while a third appeal judgement went against the council.

“Therefore, with three different decisions at three separate hearings, it makes sense to get final clarity by appealing to the Supreme Court.

“It’s important to view the cost of legal advice in the context of the £28 million the increment freeze has saved and the large number of jobs this has helped to protect.”

There have been three court cases – it was first taken to an employment tribunal before a new decision was issued by a further tribunal.

In 2017, the case was referred to the Court of Appeal and in April; that court found in favour of the 600 council workers.

In a letter sent to the council by four trade union leaders, it has been claimed the council has set aside £17.9m to settle the back payments should it lose at the Court of Appeal.